Best Banks for second Mortgages

The Best Banks for Second Mortgages

Islamic mortgages in the UK are more expensive than traditional mortgages. This discrepancy has good reasons. In fact, Islamic banks are eclipsed by many of the conventional second-tier banks in Britain. How would you advise customers to obtain the best possible mortgage business?

So why do Islam mortgages usually be more expensive than traditional mortgages?

Main causes are the small sizes of Muslim banks and the extra business with Muslim mortgages. Mortgages in the UK are more costly than traditional mortgages. Muslim banks do not have the economy of scales that traditional banks achieve. Islam mortgages also include more and more complicated business deals.

With the growth of Muslim finances, the gap should shrink. Muslims in Britain would often choose to stay away from traditional mortgages for religion. However, when they examine the costs of Muslim mortgages (for information on how they work, see A Basic Guide to Muslim Mortgages), they are often shocked by how much more they costs than traditional mortgages.

The majority of creditors provide a bewildering array of financial products. However, for a straightforward analogy, today I went to the Al Rayan Bank website and searched their interest rate for a 60% financial to value option scheme. This is the topic of my March issue of Islamic Financial News newspaper.

Thought about the comparative price of traditional mortgages and Muslim mortgages (to this end, reducing the number of Mosharaka transactions) for housing. Muslims in Britain who want to prevent the conclusion of a traditional mortgages are often amazed that Sharia-compliant Islam mortgages are significantly more costly.

Consequently, Islam mortgages tended to be taken up only by Muslims who considered traditional mortgages to be secular. Two relatively easy causes explain why Islam mortgages in the UK are more costly than traditional mortgages. First, a traditional hypothecary loan is a fairly easy deal to legitimately record.

Real estate is sold and transferred only once by the third provider to the new owner-occupier, while the house is secured by a recorded royalty. It is a firm fee that prevents the new owners from doing anything to resell or rent the real estate to a third person until they have repaid the mortgages owed to the ban.

Repayment of the loan merely means that the new landlord sends funds to the deposit. As soon as the loan is fully repaid, the bank's firm fee for the real estate is lifted. Every piece of legislation used is highly standardized, and every British lawyer who buys real estate is conversant with it.

On the other hand, an Islam mortgage includes both the house and the new owner-occupier, who purchase the real estate together. Tenancy agreements are then necessary from the part of the real estate belonging to the banks as the new owners are tenants. One of the ways in which the Muslim mortgages are discounted is by the new owners buying extra broken units of the real estate from the banks during the term of the mortgages.

Although there is no immediate handover of these extra parts of the real estate from the banks to the owners, but only a protocol, the banks must at some point (e.g. when the new owners have purchased 100%) hand over to the new owners the title to their shares in the real estate.

In addition, there are just more formalities associated with an Islam mortgaged property, which increases the amount of money required to pay the law in comparison to a traditional one. Secondly, and above all, the independent Muslim banks in the United Kingdom are very small in comparison with the very large British traditional banks.

In fact, many of the UK's second-tier traditional banks outshine Muslim banks. Much of the cost of operating a financial institution (the need for a regulatory compliancy unit, the need for financial institution technologies and back-up agreements) does not decrease proportionally as a financial institution loses out.

Consequently, such charges are much more burdensome for small banks than for large banks. Eventually, all these expenses must be paid by the clients who take out Islam mortgages and are mirrored in the higher rates that Islam banks levy for them. For those jurisdictions where Muslim banks are similar in scale to traditional banks, the second above should vanish.

A higher incidence of Islam mortgages should also mitigate the effects of the first element, so that the comparative expense handicap of Islam mortgages should decrease. The interesting issue is whether Islam mortgages can be less expensive than traditional mortgages.

Mehr zum Thema