Best Company to get a Mortgage through

The best company to get a mortgage.

Mortgage loans for corporations - everything you need to know More and more private individuals are opting to buy real estate within a company for a reason that has been discussed in detail elsewhere (largely reduced to "taxes"). In our opinion, a "trading company" is one which has a main purpose other than the ownership of real estate. Thus, for example, a producing company can buy the premises from which it is operated, or an IT contractors (which has established itself as a public company ) can buy a home with money constructed within the company.

A " SPV " is a company that is only in existence for the purposes of owning a real estate object. I could for example start a company named "RobProp Ltd" and let this company buy a home. They do not carry out any activities at all - they only hold the real estate, have rental income and outgoings.

SPV can own a real estate, or over the course of the years more real estate can be purchased and owned by the same company. Neither a commercial company nor an SPV are joint stock corporations - and apart from this usefulness differentiation (which is my own and is not used by HMRC) there is no differentiation between them.

In both cases you are registering the company in exactly the same way, and there is nothing in particular you need to do to turn a company into a SPV or avoid it becoming one. It is not really a "true" differentiation, but it is useful to understand some important points when it comes to public company mortgage issues.

When a commercial enterprise wants to buy a real estate with a mortgage, the creditor must consider the company performing. This is because if the company's main business is suffering (e.g. the producing company is losing its largest customer), it may not be able to make its mortgage payment - or even go bankrupt.

An SPV doesn't care: it only holds the real estate, so there's no chance that its main business will get into trouble. However, there is another challenge: the company is not financially sound at all, because (when it buys its first property) it does nothing yet. Both cases usually involve a creditor providing a face-to-face guaranty from each manager of the company.

That only means that if the company stops dealing or is not able to settle its liabilities, the creditor can prosecute the director in person for the amount of cash owed: one cannot simply say "oh sorry, the company has failed" and anticipate that the liabilities will be amortized. For how long does the company have to exist?

There is a frequent misunderstanding that a company must act for a certain number of years in order to obtain a mortgage. Here, too, the company is not really relevant: it is about the managing director. In summary, for the vast majority o f investor who are considering using a private company with restricted liability for investments (mainly because of the fiscal advantages), the position is as follows: your company does not need to have acted for long: you can now start a company on-line for 20 pounds and immediately request a mortgage.

Borrowers want to see that you can fulfill your commitments - by looking at your job, earnings, credit history etc - in exactly the same way as they would if you took out the mortgage in your own name. They are asked to give a face-to-face warranty - which means that you are put on the catch for the company's debts.

In fact, the company is just a "tax package": the company borrows the mortgage to get a more favorable rate of taxation, but from the lender's point of view, everything still revolves around you. If I already have a commercial enterprise, what happens? Suppose you are an IT vendor that operates as a public company. Shall you use this company for the purchase of real estate?

On this point you should take the advise of an bookkeeper - which I am not at all - but on mortgage issues it will be easier to start a new company to buy the real estate (an SPV). How about the cash that goes into this new company to act as a capital contribution?

Again, I'm not an bookkeeper and that's not a piece of good business advice, on the other hand, it' s often useful for an investor to take out an intercompany loan: the company loans the security to the new company to spare the manager from having to withdraw the cash himself and then put it into the new company. To what extent does the procedure of obtaining a mortgage for an SPV differ from that of a person?

Really not: because again it is a pseudopersonal mortgage. Mortgage tends to bill a higher handling fee because it has more paperwork to consider: there is now you and the company to consider. You need to review the company's bylaws and create a directors protocol, which is simple but still involves additional work.

How does the mortgage subprime mortgage subprime mortgage subprime mortgage subprime mortgage subprime mortgage subprime mortgage market look? It'?s constantly getting better. As so many savers take this route as a consequence of fiscal incentive, creditors are increasing mortgaging corporations to attract investors' businesses. They must also bear in mind that credit to private firms for more "niche investments" may be particularly restricted.

When four of these creditors do not grant credit to corporations, you now have only two to select from. They should use a real estate agent to fill in the fine detail, but that is the core of the mortgage for a corporation. It' a little more costly and a little more complex, but there's nothing magical about it - it's just a case where the fiscal (and other) benefits are weighed against the drawbacks and you decide what works best for you.

Auch interessant

Mehr zum Thema