Equifax Check

Eqifax check

There was also a link to Equifax at the bottom of this page titled "Potential Impact". If you click on it, US users can check whether they are affected by the attack. As I asked for feedback, the Premium Bonds staff (i.e. the government) said that Equifax did the review.

Review 4 electoral list editions at once.

You can see whenever new information about an email addresses has been added, e.g. when it has been added as a related email addresses, when you are added to or deleted from the electoral roll. Voter registration can make a significant change in your solvency with some creditors, so it is essential to keep an eye on your voter registration number.

Having a new associated adress that you don't anticipate can also be a powerful identity fraud tool.

Verify your sources: a "source" is probably the body that passes the information directly to the credit agency.

Shimon v. Equifax Info. Llc, No. 18-cv-2959 (BMC), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174665 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2018), the Supreme Tribunal ruled that for the purpose of 15 U.S.C. 1681g, the "source" of the information is the Party that directly transmits the information to the inquiry bureau. Whilst the Tribunal ruled that it was appropriate for Equifax to construe the term "source" as the "place of origin" of information, that construct was incorrect.

Behind the scenes in 2013, a collections agency obtained a verdict against the claimant Shimon before the New York civilian courts, which was overturned about nine month later. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, a third firm, provided Equifax with information about the ruling but did not notify Equifax that it had been overturned.

The applicant contested the judgement with Equifax in May 2014 and Equifax described the judgement as 'satisfied'. The claimant claims, however, that Equifax did not fully exclude the judgement from its loan review. Several years later, the claimant asked Equifax to supply a source of information summary form for his loan reports so that he could directly address those resources, presumably to ask for the different information about the judgement.

Equifax is reported to have provided several recovery results correspondence and a copy of its complete loan record, listing the "source" of the judgement information as the judicial authority and including the court's contacts, although the judicial authority did not directly provide the information LexisNexis Risk Solutions had. In particular, the claimant alleges a breach of FCRA 1681g for Equifax's allegation of misrepresenting Equifax fraudulently by identifying the tribunal as the information vendor and not LexisNexis Risk Solutions.

EQUIFACX dismissed the application for wilful infringement of 1681g (among other claims) on the ground that its reading of the words'source' was not objective inappropriate. It concluded that Equifax's reading of the concept of "source" in 1681g(a)(2) was "sufficiently sensible, if false, to exclude a determination of intent".

Shimon, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174665 at *12. According to the CFI, the general usage of the expression'source' could mean a place of provenance or the company providing the information. It also found that the claimant had not referred to a FCRA-specific interpretation of "sources" in the law or in the Directive which was intended to check the usual sense of the notion.

Thus, the CFI found that Equifax's definition of the concept of'source' as an everyday concept was not inappropriate and contrary to a deliberate declaration.

Mehr zum Thema