Quicken Loans Address
Loan address QuickenCohen added that the respondents also caught messages containing information entered in blanks on the casper.com website, "regardless of whether the reader fills in the blanks or presses "Submit". Respondents then merged the information collected with other offline information to produce a personal information record containing personal information, complete with name and postal address, the claimant said.
NaviStone itself on its own website boasted that it "invented a advanced website user tracker technology," which allowed it to "reach previously unidentified website visitors," with a match rating of 60 to 70 per cent of site anonymity usage. Claiming that he knew nothing about monitoring his electronics activities, Cohen alleged that the defendant's attempts were in violation of the Electronics Communications Privacy Act.
Cohen attempted to defend a multi-million dollar category and sought physical and legal redress (the higher of $100 per diem for the length of the infringements or $10,000), criminal injuries and reasonable and explanatory redress. Only a few and a half years later, Michael Allen brought an almost identically suit against Quicken Loans and NaviStone before the New Jersey Supreme Courts.
All of them also paid several visits to the Quicken Loans website, but never purchased any finance from the group. Nevertheless, he claimed, the accused caught illegal and published his e-mails to provide a verbose outline. Click here to view the Cohen v. Casper Sleep Inc. appeal. Click here to view the Allen v. Quicken Loans Inc. appeal.