Three Credit Reporting Agencies
The three credit agenciesIs this blackmailing if the portfolio companies call the guys who allegedly owed for certain financial support and threaten to put the fees on their credit reports if they don't do it?
When the credit bureaus add this awkward point to people's credit statements and they are refused a house or car buy because of this point, is this blackmail then? Complicated or not, the credit bureaus made it possible for a rogue to blackmail cash. This example is based on rip-off stories currently available on the web.
That old saying "innocent until proved guilty" doesn't work with your credit reports. Credit bureaus mark your credit statement with all outstanding charges from any debt collecting agent who has declared itself willing to recover overdue receivables for any criminal enterprise, regardless of the name of that enterprise. It' then your responsability to show that you don't have to pay the moneys.
Only to prove that the business is operating a fraud, it will not do so because the credit bureau does not take into account the reporting company's name. "Phoney sex" debts are now coming in from all three big credit agencies. Proof exists that all three large credit bureaux report telephone sex debts delivered to them by Collection Consultants Associates, Inc. of Glendale, California.
Equityfax, Experian and TransUnion credit bureaux report telephone sex debts from a business named Preferred Platinum Plan. The Preferred Platinum Plan is situated in Canoga Park, California. On-line research and other proofs show that the Preferred Platinum Plan provides telephone sex for $2.95 per minutes to users. Most of the individuals charged by the Preferred Platinum Plan allege they are unaware of the fees and are refusing to make payments because they have used impending telephone conversations to allegedly charge cheating invoices.
Ecuifax, Experian and TransUnion should be limited to using this kind of debts to obstruct the right of US citizens to car and home loan payoff. To have a good credit rating, a single individual must have several different payment origins to cover interest costs on credits. Once a decision is made not to lend and not to interest, a losing individual can loose up to 30 percent of their credit rating.
So either you lend cash and interest on the cash, or you have a low credit rating is the way it seems to be told. To sum up, it can be said that there is a lack of strength in the credit information sector. Since the United States population has the promises of living, freedom and the quest for good fortune as the US Constitution says, I believe that the Supreme Court will one of these days have to decide whether the banking sector is a juridical person within the US way of living.