# How much Credit Card Debt

What is your credit card debt?

You know, most guys pay off their credit card debt the way they do. Suppose you have two or more credit card accounts and you have a fixed amount of money per months that you can use to make all your card payments. To make sure that you are paying the smallest amount of interest and thus eliminate your debt the quickest, there are only two things you need to do:

At first you must make the payment on each card. Secondly, devote all your remaining cash to the card with the highest interest will. It turns out that the vast vast majority does not buy their tickets this way. A recent UK survey by investigators analysed the repayments made by 1.4 million individuals, concentrating on those with more than one credit card with a rotating credit card (those who do not repay every month).

It creates a circumstance in which the individual has to decide how he wants to distribute his debt payments: Are they splitting the payment between tickets predicated on interest rate, debt level or any other factors? What is beautiful about this is that from an economical point of view the "optimal" behaviour is clearly and unequivocally defined:

"For these people, it is best to make the minimal amount payable on both charts, reimburse as much as possible on the high interest card, and assign further amounts to the low interest card only if they are able to fully fund the high interest card," the investigators state.

As they penetrated the information, the scientist complete that the cardboard businessman did thing antithetic. Whereas borrowers should have distributed almost 100 per cent of their overpayments (above the threshold) to the highest APR card, they devoted "only 51" instead. 5 per cent of their surplus APR card payment, which is practically identical to the totally unresponsive BASEL.

Just 10 per cent of the participants in the survey dedicated their entire overpayment to the high-interest card. Irrespective of the number of tickets a player had, this sample was valid. Humans just divided their money more or less evenly among the different types of card, regardless of the interest rates.

Consequently, many lost several hundred dollar or more in interest each year. For example, the avarage two-card budget wastes the 90 dollar per year equivalence on needless interest because it splits its interest out. And the more debt they had, the more cash they wasted: the 10 per cent of debtors with five or more playing-cards were throwing away over \$1,000 a year by just badly assigning their pay.

Were borrowers not following the normal advisory process on high-yielding assets, did they do something else? For example, many finance professionals suggest disbursing the smallest amounts first in order to achieve a simple victory and build the rigor and drive necessary to manage the larger sums. Once the investigators had performed the real allocation of transactions against the allocation one would have expected for different types of transactions, they found the best explanation of the cardholder's behaviour, the " balancing match ":

"Consumers balance the proportion of refunds on each card with the proportion of credit on each card," wrote the research team. Let's say one individual has \$10,000 on one card and \$5,000 on another and they have a \$1,500 overall that they can apply to both in a given monthly period. chances are they will be paying down \$1,000 on the bigger ticket and \$500 on the smaller, regardless of interest rates or any other interests.

Scientists suggest that they do this because credit card accounts are one of the first things we think of when we think of our credit card accounts - they are prominent at the top of our months' accounts, often in large, fat type. "Of course, the balancing match is a result of the eye-catching presentation of credit card bill balancing and the wide trend for people (and other species) to use "matching" hedge statistics in making decisions," the writers state.

"Voluntary persons could make payment on [these] clearly identified balance (instead of less strongly identified interest rates). A reservation is that the information used in this survey comes from the United Kingdom, so the behaviour of US card holders may be different. However, the author notes that another recent survey has found similar behaviour among card holders in Mexico, indicating that sub-optimal debt redemption can cross national boundaries.

More than 70 per cent of US homes have at least one credit card, and from 2016, 44 per cent of US homes had a certain amount of credit card debt outstanding. Many of these family members earn \$100 or even \$1,000 each year in needless interest charges, the British survey suggested.